Step 4 of 5 · Reviewer Evaluation

How are records reviewed where you work?

Nine questions, about four minutes. This is the research contribution, and it carries no certificate: the certificate is issued for completing the training. The programme can already say how consistently the five conditions are applied under study conditions; it cannot yet say what record review actually looks like inside working organizations, and that is the gap these answers fill.

Your answers are stored with no name attached. They are written as an anonymous row carrying only the answers, your sector, a coarse organization size and a two-letter country code. No name, no email, no employer and no free text goes into that row.

If you ask for a LinkedIn recommendation at the end, your name and email are written as a separate record that does not contain your answers. The two share nothing that links them. You are not trading candour for anything, and nothing you say here can be traced back to you.

Please answer for the organization as it is, not as policy says it should be. A guarded answer is worth less than no answer.

Your context

All three are optional and all three are coarse on purpose. None of them identifies an employer.

In return for your time

Optional. The evaluation itself asks for no identifying detail; anything below is a separate record.

Optional · In return for your time
By checking this box, you consent to research follow-up and secure storage and transfer of your contact information if JRS assets are transferred to a successor project.

Your contact details are stored as a separate record that does not contain your answers. The two cannot be joined. The recommendation describes your contribution to this research and does not assert anything about your professional performance, which has not been observed.

0 of 9 answered

Free · No credit card · Answers stored with no name attached

A partial return is still useful. If a question does not apply to your organization, leave it blank rather than guessing.