JRS Review Conditions
The five conditions themselves: reconstructability, basis identification, chronology, decision-process traceability, evidentiary sufficiency. What each one asks and what a failure looks like.
Six self-paced modules and a companion desk reference for deciding whether a record can still explain its own conclusion, particularly where AI-assisted drafting has contributed to it. Built for compliance, HR, audit, legal, AI governance and investigative reviewers. Module 1 opens with no sign-up.
Written by Phillip Wikes, former Lead Civil Rights Officer, Maryland Commission on Civil Rights, M.S. Negotiation and Conflict Management. The five review conditions taught here have been applied record by record by 57 international reviewers across three studies, including 36 independent experts across 16 countries who each completed a full 24-record set.
✓ No registration required · Responses kept separate from contact details · Optional LinkedIn Recommendation
Each module ends in a short applied exercise. Progress saves in your browser, so you can stop and come back. The full set takes most reviewers two to three hours.
The five conditions themselves: reconstructability, basis identification, chronology, decision-process traceability, evidentiary sufficiency. What each one asks and what a failure looks like.
The patterns that recur across real records: conclusions without a stated basis, chronologies that cannot be followed, and characterizations with no visible source.
What a second reviewer needs from a file, when a record should be returned to the drafter, and how to write an escalation that survives being read a year later.
Reviewing records that a model helped draft. Polished prose can hide missing evidence and untraceable reasoning, and the same five conditions still apply.
Applying the conditions to investigative files: interview records, evidence handling, and whether the finding can be rebuilt from the file alone.
Putting pre-finalization review into an existing workflow without adding a stage, and what to report to leadership.
Every figure is recomputed from the study database rather than transcribed. The two reported as interim have not met their pre-registered secondary criterion and say so. Full detail on the research and validation page.
No sign-up for the first module. Registration unlocks the remaining five and the certificate.
Pressure-test the standard (4-minute evaluation) → Open Module 1 firstFree access · No credit card · Module 1 opens straight away