Public resources · Free and ungated

Use JRS without buying software.

These tools help practitioners examine whether a consequential decision record preserves the basis, evidence, reasoning, and chronology needed for later independent review.

No purchase, account, or registration is required. Training is open without registration. Contact details are requested only if you choose to receive a named completion certificate and project updates with consent.

Public standard, controlled implementation. These practitioner materials explain and support use of the public JRS methodology. Review Engine source code, deployment architecture, and non-public evaluation infrastructure remain part of the controlled implementation.

Interactive check · About five minutes

Seven-Point Record Defensibility Check

Work through one closed matter in your browser. Nothing is uploaded, and no sign-up is required.

Check a record →
Reference PDF

JRS Review Controls

Download the core review controls for use before a consequential record is finalized.

Download PDF ↓
One-page field aid

Rapid Review Card

Keep the five review conditions and routing logic close at hand during a document review.

Download card ↓
Three practitioner editions

Investigator Guides

Apply JRS in employment and EEO, fair-housing, and international equality and human-rights investigation contexts.

Open the guides →
Six modules · Self-paced

Reviewer Training

Learn the method and apply the five conditions. All modules are open. Registration is optional and is used only for a named certificate and consented updates.

Begin training →
Worked examples

Decision Record Simulations

Compare stronger and weaker records, identify reconstruction risks, and practice routing findings for human review.

Open simulations →
Open reference library

Review Conditions Reference

Use concise references on chronology, context loss, escalation, reviewer boundaries, and other implementation concepts.

Browse the reference →
Evidence and limitations

Research Record

Examine what has been tested, what the observed results establish, and what remains under validation.

Examine the evidence →
Technical specification · Version 1.0

Decision Reconstruction Manifest

Review the public schema, a constructed example, current-versus-target status, integrity controls, human-review requirement, and customer-controlled storage model.

Open the Manifest package →
Corporate Compliance Insights · September 29, 2026

That AI-Drafted Termination Memo Could Become Evidence

Hekim Colpan and Phillip Wikes examine how AI-assisted drafting can leave an employment record more polished than the evidence behind it, and describe a pre-finalization control for consequential records.

Read the article →