Technical Supplements · Open Reference

Investigator Guides

A free, operational method for assessing whether an administrative record contains sufficient, traceable support for its conclusions, particularly where AI-assisted drafting has contributed to the record. Three editions, for employment (EEO), fair-housing, and international equality and human-rights investigations, each built around five review conditions and a Record Interrogation Framework a reviewer can apply at intake or before finalization.

Written by Phillip Wikes, former Lead Civil Rights Officer, Maryland Commission on Civil Rights, M.S. Negotiation and Conflict Management. The method behind these guides has been graded record by record by 58 international reviewers across three studies, including an expert panel of 36 independent experts across 16 countries, each completing a full 24-record set.

Free access · No credit card · Instant download

001-INV-E · v1.1
Employment / EEO Edition
For investigators, fact-finders, and EEO counselors. Covers EEO / EEOC intake and workplace investigations: performance, discipline, accommodation, and investigative records, with AI-documentation risk patterns and a record-interrogation framework tuned to employment files.
Instant PDF · 9 pages · printable audit matrix · free to use and share
Download now ↓
001-INV-H · v1.1
Fair Housing Edition
For fair-housing investigators, FHAP intake staff, housing providers, and compliance personnel. Covers tenant-screening denials, availability records, and reasonable-accommodation and modification determinations, with a record-interrogation framework tuned to housing files.
Instant PDF · 9 pages · printable audit matrix · free to use and share
Download now ↓
001-INV-INT · v1.1
International Edition
Jurisdiction-neutral, for equality bodies and national human rights institutions. Covers discrimination investigations across employment, housing, and access to goods and services under one method, with a record-interrogation framework free of country-specific statutes.
Instant PDF · 9 pages · printable audit matrix · free to use and share
Download now ↓
Your download has started

That one is yours. Two things that go with it.

If the file did not start, use this link. Nothing was asked of you for it and nothing was recorded about you.

Nothing further is required of you. If you want to give something back, the reviewer evaluation asks nine questions about how records are reviewed where you work. It takes about four minutes, it is anonymous, and it does not ask who you are.

To test a record you already have, work through the Seven-Point Record Defensibility Check. It takes one closed matter and about five minutes, asks for no registration and no upload, and your answers stay in your browser.

As AI-assisted drafting enters investigative and administrative documentation, records can read as complete and professional while lacking traceable factual grounding. The basis for a conclusion may live in the author's memory rather than on the page, a distinction that becomes significant when the author is no longer available and the record must be examined on its own.

The Justification Review Standard (JRS) provides a structured way to identify those documentation-traceability gaps before a record is finalized. Each guide walks through the five conditions, the AI-documentation risk patterns, a Record Interrogation Framework, and a one-page reviewer quick reference.

Stated precisely

These guides are supplemental investigative references. They do not constitute legal advice, establish legal sufficiency, or replace applicable investigative procedures. References to specific agencies or statutes describe the contexts in which the method may be applied and do not imply endorsement or affiliation. Applicable jurisdiction, national legislation, and organizational procedures govern.

Building software

Everything here stays free to read, run and teach from. If you build or sell a platform where records get written, the same review runs as one call before a record is finalized. The text is transmitted to the model provider to be assessed, so decide what is appropriate to send before you wire it in.

API contract → Enterprise inquiry →